Asrock G41M-VS3.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock G41M-VS3.  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 89.7
44% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 90.2
12% 90.2 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 4
4% 4.92 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.4 4.7 4.5 5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 10.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.5
6% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.3
766% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 480GB
26GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6 5.7 5.9 5.5 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 8.8
Write 9.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 5.6
6% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 4.4
762% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-VS3. Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G41M-VS3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback