Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 16:51
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 129
53% 89 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 387
38% 314 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 74.1
48% 65.1 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 50.6
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 266 295 331 316 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 459
Write 409
Mixed 407
SusWrite 310
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 30.6
95% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 176
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 109%
3.0 60GB 60GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1.094.26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 76 148 76 100 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
Read 462
Write 126
Mixed 194
SusWrite 103
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 6.9
52% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 53.5
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 11.7
21% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
119GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 104
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
836GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 145 148 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 136
Write 118
Mixed 30
SusWrite 145
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback