Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T SE  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 21:04
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 152
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 312
35% 276 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2990) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 50.7
34% 43.3 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 49
Splatting 36.2
37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 104 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 336
Write 181
Mixed 214
SusWrite 104
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 32.8
110% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 90.4
83% 129 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
118GB free
Firmware: 505CUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 103 104 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 310
Write 183
Mixed 201
SusWrite 103
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 27.6
95% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 102
85% 121 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54%
Great: 85%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
0GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65.5
Write 53.7
Mixed 42.7
66% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK03 3TB
9GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 18 18 21 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 51.8
Write 41.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 19.7
45% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 62%
JMicron Generic DISK00 3TB
173GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.8 4.5 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 5
24% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 57.7
Write 47.5
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 13.9
54% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK04 640GB
46GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 81 84 82 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 95.5
Mixed 41
SusWrite 82
101% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback