Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20079

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20079  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 15:37
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 142
61% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 167
24% 174 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 397A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.981.0.0
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 1.88
1% 1.84 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 2.22
1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 42 31 21 22 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 52
Write 49.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 32.3
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3020EF48E8W1333 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20079 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20079

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback