Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 16:47
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$62
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 170
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 241
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.7
4% 7.03 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 63 29 30 71 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 125
Write 100
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 54.9
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
61GB free
Firmware: FBEOC40F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 61.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 61.2
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G266681 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback