Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS65 Stealth Thin 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16Q2  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 15:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 731
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 1227) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Lighting 86
Reflection 110
Parallax 89
70% 95.1 fps
MRender 90.7
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 90.1
72% 88.2 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 69%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1227) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.59
6% 8.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 15.1
10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 635 638 640 639 633 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,144
Write 1,910
Mixed 998
SusWrite 683
319% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 60.2
195% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 842
631% 842 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 226%
Great: 332%
1TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 37
Write 38.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 40.2
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 29
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16Q2 Builds (Compare 1,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback