Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '18 at 16:31
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 715 69% 570 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 51.1 44% 56 fps	MRender 77.8 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 71 56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 296 293 292 290 288 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1,751 Write 1390 Mixed 531 SusWrite 327 221% 1,000 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 45.9 156% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 39.8 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 44.8 80% 147 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 236%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 101 101 101 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 102 Mixed 81 SusWrite 99.7 69% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 138GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 50.7 Write 55.3 Mixed 51 SusWrite 53.7 39% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 443GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 108 109 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 55.2 Write 51.7 Mixed 33 SusWrite 108 45% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 301GB free Firmware: JEDOA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 80.8 Write 83 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 84.1 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 51%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 236GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 82 81 82 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 76.7 Write 82.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 80.4 55% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 128 130 128 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 126 Write 120 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 127 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 F4-2666C15-8GRR TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 F4-2666C15-8GRR 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 33.3 96% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 28.4 80% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16