Today's hottest deals
Intel
AMDHDZ965FBGMBOX
$144

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.0GHz, Core.
Release date: Q1 2008.

 $144 

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, K10.
Release date: Q1 2009.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 111,982 user samples
68,540 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 24% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 24% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 1085th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
43,442 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 4.4 GHz
Worst Bench: 35% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 751st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
40.3 % 52.6 % Much faster effective speed.
+30%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
67.9 Pts 76.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+13%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
41.2 Pts 47.8 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
73.8 Pts 94.8 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+28%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
76.9 Pts 165 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+115%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
78.1 Pts 171 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+119%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
78.9 Pts 88.9 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+13%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
48.1 Pts 56.5 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
95.5 Pts 112 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
95.4 Pts 208 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+118%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
95.4 Pts 210 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+120%
Market Share
Based on 68,942,739 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
62.4 % 63 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 56 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$57 Much cheaper.
+61%
$144
Age
Newest
202 Months 188 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
130 Watts 125 Watts +4%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
2 cores 4 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
2 threads 4 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
45 nm 45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+13%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+13%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
95.4 Pts 209 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+119%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
78 Pts 172 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+121%
Series
CPU Architecture
Core K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
LGA775 AM2+ AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 is amongst the fastest of the Core 2 Duo range of now nearly ten year old CPUs. The E8400 is included in our group tests simply as a reference point due to its huge success back in its day. Running at a clock speed of 3.0 GHz the E8400 has an effective speed of 52 which is 85% slower than its modern day counterparts. The relative lack of performance is especially noticeable in the area of multi-core processing as a consequence of the E8400's relatively few two cores. Anyone considering an upgrade needn't hesitate as modern CPUs are not only orders of magnitude faster but also considerably more energy efficient and feature packed. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

At nearly five years of age the AMD Phenom II X4 965 has been included in the CPU group test primarily as a reference. This hugely successful CPU from AMD has been one of the most popular gaming PC's of all time. With superb Single threaded, and therefore real-world performance, the X4 was able to compete with Intel's first generation of Core chips in terms of raw processing power and it did so at a lower price point. Today of course the X4 processor has been far surpassed by Intel's third and fourth generation Core processors. [Feb '12 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback