Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8071513600K
AMD100-100001277WOF

14 Cores, 20 Threads @3.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q4 2022.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.3GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 27,606 user samples
27,559 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 128% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 117% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 117% Great: 128%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
47 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 128% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 128%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
122 % +3% 118 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
83.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
77.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
213 Pts 228 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
427 Pts 445 Pts +4%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
852 Pts +1% 847 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1454 Pts 1608 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+11%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.7 Pts +0% 92.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
227 Pts 244 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
454 Pts 487 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+7%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
905 Pts 956 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+6%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1568 Pts 1890 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+21%
Market Share
Based on 68,738,639 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.61 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,425%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
130 % Much better value.
+37%
94.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % Hugely more popular.
+85%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$218 Much cheaper.
+65%
$623
Age
Newest
23 Months 1 Months Hugely more recent.
+96%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts More energy efficient.
+26%
170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
14 cores 16 cores Higher core count.
+14%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
20 threads 32 threads Much higher thread count.
+60%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm 4 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+60%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster base frequency.
+23%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.1 GHz 5.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2611 Pts 4816 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+84%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2437 Pts 4163 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+71%
Series
CPU Architecture
Raptor Lake Zen5
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 770 RDNA2

Intel’s 13th gen. Raptor Lake CPUs offer around 10% faster gaming and 45% faster multi-core performance than their predecessors. The new CPUs are compatible with DDR4 memory and Z690/B660 ($150) motherboards. New high-end gaming builders need look no further than the 13600K. The 13600K beats AMD’s flagship 7950X in gaming and almost matches the 7900X in multi-core performance. Extreme workstation users may find value in the 13700K or 13900K. Gamers on a tight budget can save $40 USD with a 13600KF which is a 13600K without integrated graphics. Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core, higher platform costs and higher unit prices AMD have a 3D joker up their sleeve (7800X3D est. 2023). Via “Advanced Marketing” on youtube, forums, reddit, and twitter AMD will demonstrate that their upcoming CPU is the “best in the world” and offer “proof” by way of a small handful of obscure workloads. Games that few people play e.g. (Factorio, SotTR) will be cherry picked, video footage of the gameplay/settings won’t be provided and frame drops will be conveniently ignored. This playbook has easily outsold Intel in recent years but with every overhyped release, consumers lose trust in AMD. Based on social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Meanwhile Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for a whopping 5.03%. Largely thanks to marketing incompetence, Intel is existentially motivated to deliver material annual performance improvements. Consumers can look forward to Meteor Lake (14th gen) in less than a years time. [Oct '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback