Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000010WOF
AMD100-100000909WOF

24 Cores, 48 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2019.

12 Cores, 24 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q1 2023.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 8,416 user samples
6,609 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 177th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
1,807 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 124% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 103% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 103% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
87.2 % 117 % Much faster effective speed.
+34%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
71.4 Pts 85.3 Pts Lower memory latency.
+19%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
143 Pts 206 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+44%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
284 Pts 403 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+42%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
551 Pts 790 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+43%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1092 Pts 1497 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+37%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
81.7 Pts 97.3 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+19%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
152 Pts 220 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+45%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
303 Pts 437 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+44%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
590 Pts 843 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+43%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1173 Pts 1618 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+38%
Market Share
Based on 68,926,874 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.06 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
61.3 % 97.6 % Much better value.
+59%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
50 %
Price
Price (score)
$1,004 $530 Much cheaper.
+47%
Age
Newest
59+ Months 20+ Months Much more recent.
+66%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
4616 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+63%
2840 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
4251 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+57%
2711 Pts

"Build to perform. Designed to win". Launched 25 November of 2019, this mighty 24 core 48 thread CPU boasts 88 PCIe 4.0 lanes (16 lanes used for high-speed interconnect, 176 PCIe 3.0 lanes effective), 142.25MB of cache, 3.8GHz base and 4.5GHz max boost clock with 280W effective TDP. This CPU competes well with entire of Intel HEDT and Xeon lineup thanks to unprecedented single core performance and insane multi core performance compared to all Intel HEDT CPUs. The new Threadripper 3000 series CPU is (in my opinion) classified as the Extreme High End Desktop (EHEDT) CPU as this CPU has both very high single core and multi core performance, high amount of PCIe lanes and L3 cache and clearly very high price (this CPU costs $1399.99 at launch) which ranks them above HEDT. [Nov '19 ColdSpy]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD 7000X3D CPUs have the same core architecture as the rest of the 7000 series but they have one group of eight "3D" cores with extra cache. The “3D” cores are priced higher but run at 10% lower clocks. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 7000X variant. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with an RTX 4090 ($2,000) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. AMD continue to develop “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers with the obvious aim of compensating for second tier products with first tier marketing. PC gamers considering a 7000X3D CPU need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote overpriced niche products (X3D, EPYC, Threadripper etc.). Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of the price. Workstation users (and RTX 4080+ gamers) may find value in higher core CPUs such as the 16-core $400 13700K. Despite offering better performance at lower prices, as long as Intel continues to sample and sponsor marketers that are mostly funded by AMD, they will struggle to win market share. [Mar '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback