AMD100-100000022BOX
IntelBX80677I77700K

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @4.2GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+16%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
101 EFps 108 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+7%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
131 EFps 134 EFps +2%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
119 EFps 125 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+5%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps 145 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+11%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 835,108 user samples
261,643 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 75% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 75% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 94th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
573,465 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
84.8 % 86.8 % +2%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
3 % Hitm2 0%, FarC5 9%, StrangeB 2%, TWarW2 1%, SotTR 1%, ACO 0%, MetroEx 4%, MESoW 7%, Divis2 2%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
4 % Hitm2 4%, F118 4%, GTAV 5%, SotTR 2%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
13 % BFV 3%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 26%, Divis2 12%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.7 Pts 90.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+16%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
133 Pts 133 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
260 Pts +2% 254 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
488 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+9%
447 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
810 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+22%
666 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.4 Pts 96.7 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
141 Pts 148 Pts +5%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
280 Pts 287 Pts +2%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
545 Pts +2% 532 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
876 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+16%
757 Pts
Market Share
Based on 45,102,415 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.93 % 1.17 % Higher market share.
+26%
Value
Value For Money
81.4 % 81.5 % +0%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 80 % More popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score)
$322 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
$350
Age
Newest
24 Months Much more recent.
+56%
55 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 91 Watts +4%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz 4.2 GHz Faster base frequency.
+11%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 4.5 GHz +2%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1128 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+48%
761 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1057 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+57%
672 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Kaby Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1151
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None HD 630
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Core i7-7700K is Intel’s flagship Kaby Lake based CPU which is reported to have the same IPC as its predecessor, Skylake. Comparing the 7700K and 6700K shows that both average effective speed and peak overclocked speed are up by 7%. Most of the increase in average effective speed is explained by the 5% boost in base clocks from 4.0 to 4.2 GHz. The improved peak lab speed is attributable to a combination of better overclocking capacity and improvements in Intel’s speedshift technology which make the 7700K slightly more responsive. Kaby Lake also has marginally better HD 630 integrated graphics. The i7-7700K is priced similarly to the i7-6700K so for top end gaming and workstation builds, the 7700K is the clear choice for 2017. AMD’s Ryzen will release later this year so things could change at that time. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $317Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback