Asus X99-A

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A (all builds)
Memory	89.7 GB free of 96 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '18 at 18:37
Run Duration	528 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 137 2-Core 273 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 869 85% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,238 77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 160 Parallax 150 120% 152 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 143 Splatting 118 104% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 3TB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 171 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 47 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 64 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 226904	96% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 407 Mixed 413 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 41.7 156% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.1 DQ Write 82.8 DQ Mixed 120 75% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 132%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 171 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 47 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 584730058	81.1% Excellent	Read 484 Write 261 Mixed 270 74% 338 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 26.1 117% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 82.4 104% 189 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 3TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2568 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 338 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 49 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4723507852	98.9% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 396 Mixed 405 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 43.4 156% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 41.8 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 120 98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 3TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2490 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 330 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2592216406	106% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 394 Mixed 413 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 42.2 155% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 130 145% 247 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 1,885 Write 1,270 Mixed 1,362 334% 1,506 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 33.3 148% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 43.8 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 131 96% 120 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 283%
JMicron H/W RAID0 10TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 7.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.3% Excellent	Read 201 Write 179 Mixed 105 196% 162 MB/s	4K Read 4.56 4K Write 5.24 4K Mixed 0.42 210% 3.41 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 91%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 464 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.57% Terrible	Read 25.4 Write 3.22 Mixed 5.61 10% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.06 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 34% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.57% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 6x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 6 of 8 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	141% Outstanding	MC Read 54.8 MC Write 59.9 MC Mixed 54.1 161% 56.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 23 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1,232x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	326x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	143x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	171x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	32x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $748

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16