Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171211
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 16:26
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 224 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 890 79% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,235 76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Lighting 75.9 Reflection 76.6 Parallax 66.7 62% 73.1 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 69.3 57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 445 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 156 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 64 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 74 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7094944625
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 526GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 136 136 21491876135 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 885 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3000 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 602 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 885 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 885 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 210454249505 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67.8% Good	Read 120 Write 116 Mixed 121 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.15 82% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 233GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 164386688 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4291 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 458696902 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7949 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1862 (B7) Unknown 97 97 3 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540394007 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 45 672202785 (C2) HDA temperature 33 55 47244640289 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 17 164386688 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 15 24441 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 138899242360432 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1084478125 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2833792827	60.6% Good	Read 113 Write 96.5 Mixed 99.5 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 6.65 4K Mixed 0.5 202% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 5,247 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 32.1 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 23 SC Write 37.7 SC Mixed 28.4 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)