Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 16:21
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 137
58% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 381
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.3% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
91% 110 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 109
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 246 189 196 198 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 354
Write 354
Mixed 343
SusWrite 212
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 31.5
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 120
114% 177 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90
444GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 343 374 376 377 357 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 413
Mixed 408
SusWrite 353
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 49.8
161% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 140
132% 206 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 137%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
465GB free
Firmware: MX4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 174 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 153
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 174
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 891 152 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback