Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '17 at 20:34
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 140
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 433
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.7
17% 19.1 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 482
Write 372
Mixed 396
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 32.3
119% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 50
54% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 153
Write 158
Mixed 151
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.63
4K Mixed 0.27
120% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 158
Mixed 132
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.25
109% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 101%
ST750LM0 30-1KKG62 750GB
458GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 22.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 22.2
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.71
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.15
28% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 44%
ASMT 2115 2TB
329GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 29.6
Mixed 29.1
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.38
87% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback