MSI MS-17G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GS75 Stealth 8SE
MotherboardMSI MS-17G1  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 04:32
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 628
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1277) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69% Good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 83.1
68% 85.6 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 74.3
72% 89.8 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,543
Write 1,273
Mixed 812
268% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 63.5
209% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 875
670% 917 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
WD Game Drive 2TB
658GB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 84 85 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 76.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 85.1
104% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 5% 44 15 6 144 17.2" 1920 1080 CMN175C
History: Score 20: 3R 1G 2B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B
Typical MS-17G1 Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback