| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 21 '21 at 15:09 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.1%
Above average
|
53% 86.3 Pts
|
28% 210 Pts
|
15% 249 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
16% 18.8 fps
|
17% 20.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 200 147 199 178 197 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
40% 183 MB/s
|
78% 25.2 MB/s
|
50% 89.4 MB/s
|
|
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
7.82%
Terrible
|
6% 26.8 MB/s
|
16% 4.7 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 119 121 121 121 116 MB/s
|
43.8%
Average
|
54% 74.6 MB/s
|
76% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.3%
Below average
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
46% 87.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |