Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 12:29
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 88 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 126 61% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 186 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68% Good	Lighting 74.7 Reflection 114 Parallax 107 61% 98.4 fps	MRender 97 Gravity 96.6 Splatting 104 82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 103 104 108 112 112 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 237 Write 218 Mixed 195 SusWrite 104 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 16 73% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 77.6 DQ Mixed 42 36% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 124%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 94GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 92 77 89 89 90 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.9% Average	Read 232 Write 216 Mixed 195 SusWrite 84.6 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 25.9 87% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 77.1 DQ Mixed 36.9 33% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 87%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 219GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 111 109 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 109 Write 40.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 107 60% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.2 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 90 79 89 89 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 162 Write 127 Mixed 66 SusWrite 85.5 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 113%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1402 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 31 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 19.6 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 230% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 97%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,115 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1.5TB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 63.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 79.5 80% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 44%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 235GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 27.5 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 17.8 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 21%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 142GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 64 64 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 78.7 Write 79.5 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 63.7 91% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 15.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.4 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16