Sun Ultra 24

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSun Ultra 24  (all builds)
MotherboardSun Ultra 24
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 08:48
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 84.1
44% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 154
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3125) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.16
1% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 157 148 202 206 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.5% Good
Read 249
Write 251
Mixed 230
SusWrite 181
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 39.3
122% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 163
127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 126%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB
205GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 65 71 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 73.7
Write 81.2
Mixed 44
SusWrite 71
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 70%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB
335GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 58 63 63 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 78.5
Write 84.6
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 63.3
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 70%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
147GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 60 66 71 72 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 75.6
Write 75.6
Mixed 58
SusWrite 67.9
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 86%
2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.1
4% 4.07 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Ultra 24 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sun Ultra 24

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $439
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback