bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	GT70 2OC/2OD
Motherboard	MS-1763
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130722
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '22 at 12:36
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400 26,927 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 210 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 472 53% 415 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 10E8) 3GB CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 19.6 Parallax 24.5 15% 21 fps	MRender 23.3 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 19.3 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB 13,500 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 248 258 260 261 257 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 907 Write 270 Mixed 314 SusWrite 254 96% 436 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 34.3 134% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 164 144% 212 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 841GB free Firmware: 0406 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 32.1 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 15.9 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.5 186% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 28.8 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 16 20% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.7 219% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB 3,351 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 28GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 26 28 29 29 29 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 79.6 Write 45.9 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 28.7 68% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 44% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 32%
USB Flash DISK 32GB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 15 27 27 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 13.7 Write 0.2 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 22.1 12% 9.38 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 27%
2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.19% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 10.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 10.8 15% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.19% Great: 6%
VendorCo ProductCode 1GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 12.9 Write 7.7 Mixed 8.5 12% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Weiao Flash-Disk 989GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 921GB free, PID 3020 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 6.1 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.41% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 11 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 10.4 17% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.9 125% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.41% Great: 19%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 84GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.93% Terrible	Read 32.7 Write 26.1 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 10.6 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 73% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 37%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 116GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 33.6 Write 29.9 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 10.6 33% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 66% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 37%
USB Mass Storage Device 253GB 88GB free, PID 125a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.5% Poor	Read 18.1 Write 16.9 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 10.5 21% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 7 517% 6.67 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 9.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	933x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	822x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16