Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 21:50
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$145 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 140 2-Core 276 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 788 82% 658 Pts	64-Core 745 46% 745 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 86.3 56% 74.8 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 58 53% 66 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 1186 1212 1248 1232 1297 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 1,850 Write 1,428 Mixed 839 SusWrite 1,211 298% 1,332 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 47.8 178% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,314 DQ Write 1,070 DQ Mixed 1,112 854% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 353%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 960GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 390GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 321 300 280 267 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 209 Write 123 Mixed 324 SusWrite 277 53% 233 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 20.7 83% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 781 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 160 206% 387 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 139%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 429GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 219GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 85 87 86 86 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 87.7 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 85.3 67% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 7.8 1,304% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX3000C15D4/8GX KHX3000C15/16GX 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.7 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	202x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	160x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	131x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	59x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	44x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $774

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16