Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 12:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 170
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 610
54% 460 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
MSI(1462 3418) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 79.6
51% 67.5 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 57.4
51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 295 212 209 222 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 454
Write 358
Mixed 290
SusWrite 252
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 40.3
125% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 215
190% 288 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 123%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
271GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 33.3
Write 28
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 37.2
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.5% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 23.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback