Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 153 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 229 29% 221 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 20.4 20% 20.8 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 17.6 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 61 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 59414478	56.8% Above average	Read 386 Write 224 Mixed 170 57% 260 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 11.9 89% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 60.5 DQ Mixed 15.2 21% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 110%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 14.2 22% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.38 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.63 71% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C6 2x2GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.1% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 17.6 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.1 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	6x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	5x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	6x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

RAM
DDR3 1866 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 45%, 14 samples	3x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 3,923 samples	2x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 61%, 6,123 samples	2x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $131

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16