Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80662G4400
IntelBX80605I5750

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.3GHz, Skylake.
Release date: Q4 2015.

4 Cores, 4 Threads @2.66GHz, Nehalem.
Release date: Q3 2009.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 80,228 user samples
36,432 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 23% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 23% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 892nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
43,796 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 582nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
47.5 % 61.5 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
69.3 Pts 85.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+24%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
85.3 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+28%
66.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
143 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+9%
131 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
150 Pts 218 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+45%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
154 Pts 228 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+48%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.3 Pts 94.3 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
103 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+21%
85.1 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
206 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+20%
172 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
205 Pts 299 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+46%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
205 Pts 304 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+48%
Market Share
Based on 69,008,510 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.05 % Much higher market share.
+67%
Value
Value For Money
97.9 % +4% 93.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 54 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$20 Much cheaper.
+67%
$60
Age
Newest
109 Months Much more recent.
+41%
184 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
47 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+51%
95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
2 cores 4 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
2 threads 4 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz Faster base frequency.
+24%
2.66 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.3 GHz +3% 3.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
205 Pts 300 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+46%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
152 Pts 230 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+51%
Series
CPU Architecture
Skylake Nehalem
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 LGA1156
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 510 None
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'15 Q3'09
Cache
Cache
3 MB SmartCache 8 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2 SSE4.2
Lithography
Lithography
14 nm 45 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$64.00 $193.00 - $213.00
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
8 GT/s DMI3 2.5 GT/s DMI
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
64 GB 16 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V DDR3 1066/1333
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
34.1 GB/s 21 GB/s
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Yes No
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
No 1.0
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3.0 2.0
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 1x16, 2x8

More specs » More specs »

The Intel Core i5-750 is a mid-range quad core, four thread desktop processor which is part of the Nehalem series launched in Q3 2009. Considering the age of this processor, its effective speed of 67 is damn impressive. It has a base frequency of 2.66 GHz, which boosts to 3.2 GHz turbo when under load and can be significantly extended beyond by overclocking. Combined with a decent graphics card, the i5-750 should give a reasonable gaming experience even by today’s standards. There are of course faster modern alternatives such as the i5-4690K, but if you already have the 750 with an older graphics card it's likely that your GPU will need updating before the CPU. Comparing the 750 and 4690K shows that the 4690K has an effective speed of 109 which is 62% faster than the now five years old i5-750. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback