Intel
AMD

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.0GHz, Core.
Release date: Q1 2008.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 79,464 user samples
68,540 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 24% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 24% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 1060th / 1443
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
10,924 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 21% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 21% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 1068th / 1443
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
40.3 % +1% 40 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
67.9 Pts +3% 66.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
41.2 Pts 55 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+33%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
73.8 Pts 80 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+8%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
76.9 Pts 82.7 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
78.1 Pts 84 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+8%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
78.9 Pts 87.2 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
48.1 Pts 68.6 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+43%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
95.5 Pts 99.9 Pts +5%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
95.4 Pts 99.5 Pts +4%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
95.4 Pts 99.4 Pts +4%
Market Share
Based on 67,836,908 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
55.2 % 63.7 % Better value.
+15%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % +2% 52 %
Price
Price (score)
$89 $51 Much cheaper.
+42%
Age
Newest
196 Months 119+ Months Much more recent.
+39%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
95.4 Pts 99.3 Pts +4%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
78 Pts 82.4 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+6%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 is amongst the fastest of the Core 2 Duo range of now nearly ten year old CPUs. The E8400 is included in our group tests simply as a reference point due to its huge success back in its day. Running at a clock speed of 3.0 GHz the E8400 has an effective speed of 52 which is 85% slower than its modern day counterparts. The relative lack of performance is especially noticeable in the area of multi-core processing as a consequence of the E8400's relatively few two cores. Anyone considering an upgrade needn't hesitate as modern CPUs are not only orders of magnitude faster but also considerably more energy efficient and feature packed. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

I loved this thing, so much nostalgia, any sort of cpu intensive game ran like crap and any modern game will. But god, after an overclock, it really tells you how far ryzen has come on their single core, aka no where. This thing is a cheap beast, going for like $45. Don’t ever really buy it though, just get like a FX-6300, 6 cores, 6 threads versus 1 core, 2 threads at $90 (+$45 more). If you’re truly set on a $50 CPU, buy a A8 6600K. Saw those floating for the same price as this but with quad core. Overall making this product obsolete, but still no where near the worst of old tech. Especially a 6 year old product that still arguably has a fight and a half left in it. I mean it is extremely unlikely you’ll find a use for it, but under the right circumstances, I.E a strictly single core game, after a pushy overclock and in theory you would get the same FPS as a modern ryzen, as in 2020 product. P.S. Over clock the absolute hell out of this thing for the real performance. [Jan '21 ThatGuyRandomly]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback