Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80E3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B2
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 07:48
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 54.6
30% 44.4 Pts
4-Core 85.5
8-Core 95.2
12% 90.3 Pts
64-Core 96.8
6% 96.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 2.84
0% 2.45 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 43 23 40 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 52
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 34.9
23% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 63%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
947GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 36 36 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 34
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 34.5
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E3 Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback