Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJul 25 '18 at 02:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 100
50% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 245
28% 219 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3122) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 21.7
19% 21.2 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 25.1
18% 21.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 416 374 374 410 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 427
Mixed 385
SusWrite 389
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 49.8
156% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 255
191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 146 147 150 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 151
Write 150
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 149
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback