Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '16 at 21:57
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 132
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.1001
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 30
Parallax 28
19% 27.2 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 32.3
22% 25.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 424
Write 332
Mixed 328
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 17.5
118% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 17.6
47% 100 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
913GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 170
Mixed 168
131% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.87
4K Mixed 0.28
138% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Super Talent Express DUO USB 3.0 8GB-$20
2GB free, PID 0305
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 66.3
Write 12.6
Mixed 15.3
30% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.02
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.09
42% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 17.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback