Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '18 at 03:19
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 63.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 205 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 800 73% 613 Pts	64-Core 1,295 80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Gigabyte(1458 2308) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.6% Very good	Lighting 74.2 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 163 60% 102 fps	MRender 88.6 Gravity 117 Splatting 128 93% 111 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 173GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3350 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 859 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6436551762	104% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 412 Mixed 416 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 42.6 161% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 97 104% 175 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 138GB free Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 9895 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2560 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 400 (A9) Unknown 100 100 359 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 270 (AE) Unknown 100 100 135 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 40 171799805983 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2304 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 70469 (F1) Unknown 253 253 19341 (F2) Unknown 253 253 23966 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	78.2% Very good	Read 403 Write 395 Mixed 380 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 14.2 99% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 42.1 78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 99%
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 23,829 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,598 Write 585 Mixed 654 206% 946 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 33.4 131% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 17.2 36% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 141%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 163 6758 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 76 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 319 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 76 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 225 (C2) HDA temperature 124 119 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	91.5% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 161 Mixed 152 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.23 111% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 101%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 112 (03) Spinup time 138 138 30090002817 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 87 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 412 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 87 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 92 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 92 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 167504969759 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 166 Mixed 171 131% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 3.38 4K Mixed 0.43 137% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 49.5 MC Write 53.8 MC Mixed 49.8 146% 51 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 22 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16