Lenovo 42902NB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 42902NB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42902NB
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 10:21
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 138
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 210
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2321
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 1.59
2% 2.51 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
3% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 252
Write 87.8
Mixed 124
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 5.47
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 5.18
8% 16 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D3S88GB52852813 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback