Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 12:07
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 194
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 367
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 48.8
45% 53.2 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 42.2
36% 44.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 51 44 44 46 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 150
Write 60.2
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 48.7
18% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 9.7
39% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 31.1
38% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
776GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 102
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 102
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback