Today's hottest deals

IBM 818973G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM 818973G  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM IBM
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '18 at 17:34
Run Duration776 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHz-$70
WMT478/NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 28
33% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 24.9
8-Core 30.3
4% 27.6 Pts
64-Core 30.5
2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce FX 5500
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.6.8.5
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.12
0% 0.11 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IC35L060AVV207-0 34GB
17GB free
Firmware: V22OA66A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 28.6
Mixed 27.8
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.14
48% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 25%
IC35L060AVV207-0 37GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V22OA66A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 40.8
Mixed 38.8
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.12
22% 0.16 MB/s
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
3GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 2.39
Mixed 3.49
6% 6.14 MB/s
4K Read 1.39
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.18% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.8
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.6
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback