User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GBT___ AWRDACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte 8PE800
Memory	1.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20030926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 10 '18 at 07:13
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHz-$70 228 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	7.71% Terrible	Memory 11.6 1-Core 12.7 2-Core 18.1 9% 14.1 Pts	4-Core 22.1 8-Core 23.4 3% 22.8 Pts	64-Core 28.9 2% 28.9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.71% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 9600/9550/X1050 Sapphire(174B 0200) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.42 0% 0.31 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8.01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 62 52 88124603 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 56 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 254797960 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18430 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3260 (C2) HDA temperature 46 57 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 52 88124603 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	24.8% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 39.7 Mixed 29.4 29% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.26 62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 30%
Seagate ST3160021A 160GB-$75 919 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 3GB free Firmware: 8.01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 53 48 142158188 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 265 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 106684546 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22042 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6573 (C2) HDA temperature 50 55 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 47 142158188 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.1% Poor	Read 48.1 Write 49.6 Mixed 28.1 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.32 79% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 3 slots used 1GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.59% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 389 10% 389 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)