Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5440 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 62.4 1-Core 28.6 2-Core 58 34% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 161 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.48 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 1.74 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 587GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 537GB free Firmware: 7.08 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 344 Mixed 427 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 69.6 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 49.9 198% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 99.8 99% 159 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 147GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7.08 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 352 Mixed 436 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 67.8 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 57.6 208% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 105 101% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x

SSD
LOGICAL VOLUME 240GBHPBench 59%, 62 samples	1x

RAM
14GBUnknownBench 35%, 9,406 samples	1x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	1x