Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '18 at 10:26
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
None, 3 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 77.9
38% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 424
35% 305 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 161GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 57.8
Mixed 108
60% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.61
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.83
318% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 80%
Virtual HD 52GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 78.2
Mixed 97.8
71% 94 MB/s
4K Read 5.13
4K Write 3.17
4K Mixed 2.44
544% 3.58 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
3968, 8320 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 43.7
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 106%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback