bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 15:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 20.9
37% 49 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 169
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 28 50 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 2.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 37.1
9% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 67%
Virtual HD 161GB
145GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 40 38 126 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 199
Write 190
Mixed 192
SusWrite 78.5
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 7.4
1,005% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
1024, 31744 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback