Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '16 at 20:22
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 145
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 421
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 0432) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1801.1001
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 32
Parallax 42.5
29% 36.5 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 36.6
26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69% Good
Read 422
Write 319
Mixed 323
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 15
93% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 50.7
59% 104 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
918GB free
Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 126
Mixed 113
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.45
106% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 107
Write 113
Mixed 103
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.32
89% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
366GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 89.3
Write 83.4
Mixed 76.9
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.4
122% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 62.7
Mixed 59.9
48% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.28
74% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 59%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 40.2
52% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.52
66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 34%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
883GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 39
Write 41.1
Mixed 40.3
52% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.25
57% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 50%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
357GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 40.4
Mixed 39.7
52% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.27
62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback