Hasee CP75S

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hasee CP75S (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P7xxDM2(-G)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160713
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 88 2-Core 169 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 360 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 7504) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Lighting 61 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 59.2 50% 62.8 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 65.8 53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 270GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3158 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 392 (B1) Unknown 97 97 50 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 33 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18633392240	103% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 402 Mixed 406 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 43.3 159% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 124 119% 185 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 134%
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB 5,877 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,883 Write 716 Mixed 813 248% 1,137 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 28 159% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 45.6 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 27.9 56% 107 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 247%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 240GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1092 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4514 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 922 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 75 75 255263 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 244813594652 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	48% Average	Read 92.8 Write 74.6 Mixed 103 68% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.19 61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 84GB free Firmware: 0304 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 38.9 Write 41.5 Mixed 35.7 29% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.27 72% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 04CD F4-2133C15-8GRS 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.1% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 19.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CP75S Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

System: Hasee CP75S

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	2x

SSD
PM871b M.2 2280 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,851 samples	1x
850 Evo 2TBSamsung $275Bench 112%, 8,527 samples	1x

RAM
04CB Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 04CB 32GBUnknownBench 75%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16