bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 20:59
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 526
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.6
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17.1
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 470
Write 257
Mixed 258
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 8.13
51% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 30.3
52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 92%
LSI MR9261-8i 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 137
Mixed 73.2
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.59
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.19
94% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 105%
Great: 137%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
545GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 141
Write 142
Mixed 134
105% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.27
122% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
276GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 70.9
Write 66.5
Mixed 63.9
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.25
85% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 4.01
Mixed 5.94
9% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.07
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 1.27
122% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B485831363030433944332F3447582020 0x9801 0x393955353437312D3035302E4130304C46 0x9801 0x393955353437312D3035302E4130304C46 0x9801 0x4B485831363030433944332F3447582020 0x9801 0x4B485831363030433944332F3447582020 0x9801 0x4B48583136303... 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 24
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 11.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback