Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 15 '18 at 07:48
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 850 Quad Core
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 117
52% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 201
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36E2) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 22.3
19% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 17.3
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 137
Mixed 134
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
187GB free
Firmware: 0502
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 40
Write 32.9
Mixed 34.5
27% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.17
51% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback