Asus A8N-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A8N-VM  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 16:47
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon64 X2 Dual Core 3800+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
Memory 67
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 59.3
36% 52 Pts
4-Core 59.7
8-Core 59.9
8% 59.8 Pts
64-Core 59.6
4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650
Sapphire(174B 0880) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.53
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST316081 ST3160815SV 160GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AC
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 48.9
Write 54.6
Mixed 45.9
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.32
72% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x0.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback