Today's hottest deals

R-stylecomputers AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemR-stylecomputers AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte G1975X LITE
Memory2.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 07:10
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 67.9
41% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 73
8-Core 67.8
10% 70.4 Pts
64-Core 72.3
4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 89 87 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 95
Write 93
Mixed 59
SusWrite 86.1
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x0.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: R-stylecomputers AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback