Today's hottest deals

Asus K5130

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K5130  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K5130
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 29 '18 at 15:04
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330S
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 167
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 310
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.7% Average
Read 267
Write 241
Mixed 255
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 8.43
63% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 8.49
36% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 81%
WD WD7500AYYS-01RCA0 750GB
435GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 88.9
Mixed 78.7
65% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.29
92% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNNG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K5130 Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K5130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback