Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 15:42
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 260
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 821
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,140
70% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 668 676 673 673 659 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,490
Write 2,247
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 686
394% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 88.2
295% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 1,124
829% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 282%
Great: 340%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
206GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 252 219 218 219 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 502
Write 254
Mixed 284
SusWrite 229
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 27.5
124% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 25.6
70% 149 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
192GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 62 63 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 72.6
Write 47.9
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 63.3
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
258GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 98 95 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 83.4
Write 80.6
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 96.3
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 35.3
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 33.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2 Builds (Compare 2,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback