Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220723
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 05:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$112
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 159
2-Core 284
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 804
75% 624 Pts
64-Core 946
59% 946 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
Intel(8086 1020) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.5989
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 94
Reflection 135
Parallax 233
77% 154 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 192
Splatting 176
146% 179 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 100%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 511GB
63GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 398 415 414 441 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 352
Write 351
Mixed 301
SusWrite 422
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 25.2
77% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 269
225% 326 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 141 153 147 164 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 170
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 150
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 24.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 29% 41 356 17 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback