Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z890M AORUS ELITE WIFI7 ICE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z890M AORUS ELITE WIFI7 ICE  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20241018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '24 at 23:43
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 67.3
1-Core 265
2-Core 534
143% 289 Pts
4-Core 1,058
8-Core 2,036
184% 1,547 Pts
64-Core 4,177
258% 4,177 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Asus(1043 88B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 103
Parallax 125
109% 120 fps
MRender 92.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 90
77% 94.9 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$230
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6026
Write 6,773
Mixed 3,581
1,217% 5,460 MB/s
4K Read 77.3
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 117
401% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2,344
DQ Write 1,718
DQ Mixed 1,969
1,488% 2,010 MB/s
Poor: 475% Great: 926%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
305GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 151
Mixed 78.9
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C32 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
214% Outstanding
MC Read 91.6
MC Write 80
MC Mixed 79.5
239% 83.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 67.6
SC Mixed 41.7
132% 46.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 214%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 28 60 34" 1280 720 DELD158 DELL S3423DWC
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback