Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 24 '24 at 21:02
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 886
78% 665 Pts
64-Core 2,227
138% 2,227 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Gigabyte(1458 2413) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.20.30
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 242
Parallax 492
187% 321 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 288
Splatting 272
234% 288 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 183%
Great: 201%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 51.5
42% 53.2 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 45.1
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$118
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2211 2249 2238 2249 2026 1562 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 2,334
Mixed 2,232
SusWrite 2,089
510% 2,264 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 75.4
241% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 598
438% 579 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 324%
Great: 477%
Apple SM256E 251GB
17GB free
Firmware: CXM07A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 184 170 170 143 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 437
Write 184
Mixed 239
SusWrite 174
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 23.2
83% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 106
90% 136 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
119GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 44 53 47 50 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 487
Write 391
Mixed 420
SusWrite 91.5
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 42.1
140% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 237
212% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 118%
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
124GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1724 950 401 553 562 566 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,173
Write 1,711
Mixed 1,682
SusWrite 793
355% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 57.1
196% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 544
422% 578 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 222%
Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 25.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 25.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 10 215 57 75 27" 1280 720 SPT0AD7 Sceptre F27
Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback