Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1605ZA
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '24 at 14:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 44.3
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 140
50% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 371
37% 302 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 13E3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 20
Parallax 20.1
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 14.8
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme MTFDKBA512QFM-1BD1AABGB 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 800 745 529 73 155 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 810
Write 986
Mixed 753
SusWrite 399
166% 737 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 15.6
111% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 325
244% 331 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 29.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 16" 1280 720 AUO459D
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback