Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1605ZA
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 19:06
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 257
77% 146 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 800
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 13E3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 21.8
15% 20.7 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 17.8
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme MTFDKBA512QFM-1BD1AABGB 512GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1341 1431 1454 898 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,761
Write 1,584
Mixed 1386
SusWrite 1,107
328% 1,459 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 38.5
262% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 967
DQ Mixed 871
675% 919 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 256%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 28.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 15% 27 105 1 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1618
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_X1605ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback