Today's hottest deals

Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '24 at 09:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 616
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 985
61% 985 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Zotac(19DA 3696) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 268
Parallax 290
229% 280 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 247
Splatting 193
206% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 197%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,328
Write 1,002
Mixed 809
232% 1,047 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 26.3
150% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 732
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 426
382% 582 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 191%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
467GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 77.2
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
473GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 113 125 130 125 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 78.4
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 125
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 26% 39 215 58 240 27" 1280 720 SAM727A Odyssey G40B
Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback